data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/425e4/425e4e9eaa7b9f9e18757b6286df73b59fc4d42a" alt="Reviews on a mellel softball bat"
Each year we purchase one of those new bats with the new price tag to which I’m fine doing for my daughters. Some of those tech advancements that are deemed as a SUCCESS we’ll see applied to new bats ~sometimes w/ minor tinkering~ year after year.Īs we know that with those advancements generally comes with an increased price tag. Understanding that each season generally brings with it something new or different in regards to the advancement in bat technology. My question falls into the category of BEST FP BATS OF ALL TIME… Said research results provides us readers the luxury of not having to shoulder the process ourselves. We’d like to say they fixed that in the 2020 Ghost Advanced, but that seems just as non-durable.įirst off, I appreciate the time and effort you put into researching FP Bats year in and year out. Anything after 500 hits is on borrowed time. You know as well as we do, the Easton Ghost is about as non-durable as they come. That’s likely more explanation than what you needed, but there you go. It was pulling a data point from somewhere else. But it also increases our chance there is an error.īasically, you helped us find an error in the code.
#Reviews on a mellel softball bat update
It is a godsend in getting to organize all of the different articles we have on the site and it really helps us keep track and update information on bats. Instead, we use some PHP and a database of reviews and writings to get put it here. It’s a long story, but these articles are compiled in a way that you might not first imagine. If you’re okay with a bat that has a short life span and want some of the best feel and pop around, then the 2021 Easton Ghost Advanced is a legit choice.” However, we aren’t convinced Easton fixed a lot of the durability issues surrounding the bat. We werea bit confused when we saw what you wrote.Īs you can see from above in the article we write,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0eaa/a0eaa63f537911bd761d1e879c12badf9e7a7bdf" alt="reviews on a mellel softball bat reviews on a mellel softball bat"
Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Not a guilt-free process for sure, but it doesn’t come with any particular brand bias (as long as they sell it on Amazon or eBay).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d7a5/7d7a5101355598a66f34765abb086c8555077792" alt="reviews on a mellel softball bat reviews on a mellel softball bat"
Our motivations lie in convincing the reader to click on an ad or follow a link to buy Amazon. As such, we have no incentive one way or another to push a particular brand or bat type. We don’t sell bats as a manufacturer or a vendor. Then, we take that data and put together a 700 to 1200 word review that, at least we believe, is the most thorough and objective you would be able to find. Also, we study every available review we can find online or elsewhere. We talk to players at all levels of the sport about their experience. Within that process, we not only swing the bats extensively, but we talk to manufacturers about the bat’s design. With that said, we’ve reviewed hundreds of bats. But we’ve swung every baseball, softball, and fastpitch bat in the performance space since the middle of 2013. That quest is usually better left to science labs. We don’t profess to be the end all be all in determining bat performance. We are simply a group of parents and players looking to document our collective performance on fastpitch and baseball bats.
#Reviews on a mellel softball bat plus
But the 2016 Louisville Slugger Drop 10 LXT Plus consistently rises to the top any way we slice the data. None of this is to say we’d hesitate to recommend other bats-as there are a handful of good ones. Those processes above have led us, over the years, to conclude which bat generally fits the most amount of players. Some days a very tall task when considering bats in the performance fastpitch space are so very similar. Our data needed to be both accurate and helpful. Additionally, we found, to our surprise, writing our fastpitch softball bat reviews, which are vetted by our readers, kept us on our toes. Many of these conversations, with both players and engineers, were long and helpful. The hitter would often change between one particular bat and another in a matter of just minutes.įurther, we’d spend considerable time hashing out particulars of many of the bats we used with those who used it and those who manufactured it. Almost always, the hitter had multiple fastpitch bats at their disposal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25da1/25da1bc9e8c8540aaff2c8979e3112eb36d4be8a" alt="reviews on a mellel softball bat reviews on a mellel softball bat"
Much of the rest on the field among different hitters. Most of our testing happened in cage work. This effort also includes nearly 40 fastpitch models with roughly innumerable sizing options. To make our decision, we’ve spent over 200 hours testing, reviewing, reading, and writing reviews on every performance fastpitch softball bat in the market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/425e4/425e4e9eaa7b9f9e18757b6286df73b59fc4d42a" alt="Reviews on a mellel softball bat"